I can't remember ever learning to read. It was just one of those things that came to you, like walking or eating. I think I was fairly surreptitious about it too, as I surprised my mother with my facility for textual decoding (can you tell I used to be a teacher?) one day when I was about three years old.
We were out for a walk somewhere (at a guess, Stanhope Park, in Darlington) and I needed a wee. I told Mum and she said I'd have to wait. But no, I said, there is a toilet here. No, that's not for you, she said. You can't go in there. But, but, I said, I can. Look, the sign says "Laddies"!
OK, not perfect decoding of the double-consonant rule, but nearly there. I made her laugh, and she got her revenge by telling friends of the story when I was in my mid-twenties. And thirties.
Imagine my surprise, therefore, when I was browsing Facebook recently, and came across this advert in the sidebar.
Do they think I was born yesterday? Those are gurls. I know. I'm nearly four.
Motorcycles, politics, literature, music, philosophy, humour, miscellany, custard
If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.
- George Washington
Sunday, 3 November 2013
Wednesday, 30 October 2013
Comment policy
Regular readers, both of you, may remember that a while ago I turned on word verification for comments to this blog. I was getting so much spam it was 'doin my ed in like', and turning WV on stopped it instantly. However, I know from my own experience that the Blogger WV thing is very irritating and clumsy. More than once I have written a fairly thoughtful and considered response on another blog, only to give up after six attempts to decipher some random squiggles in a box. My time has been wasted, the world will miss that particular pearl of wisdom, and the whole thing is unsatisfactory. I was very reluctant to turn on WV for my own blog, as I know how big a pain it is, and I have had some feedback from readers that it was putting them off commenting.
But when you are writing and managing a blog in your spare time, spam is a real hassle and takes a lot of your attention away from where it should be, so I don't apologise for turning on WV until the tsunami of rubbish abated. I'm a bit of an innocent when it comes to these things, but the spam was increasing over time, and my guess was that the blog was getting on more and more spam lists as the spam comments were visible for a while until I got round to deleting them, and therefore appeared in some Greatest Hits in a database somewhere. My hope is that, now the blog has been silent for a few months, whoever does these things will have assumed the blog is no more and will have moved onto more fertile soil.
So, WV is OFF for the time being. Comment all you like, magnifying glasses not necessary. If the spam returns, I will have another think. It has been suggested that I allow comments from registered users only, which would solve the problem, but might bring others in its wake. We shall see.
If anyone has any bright ideas, let me know - in the comments :)
Here's a poster to make you laugh.
But when you are writing and managing a blog in your spare time, spam is a real hassle and takes a lot of your attention away from where it should be, so I don't apologise for turning on WV until the tsunami of rubbish abated. I'm a bit of an innocent when it comes to these things, but the spam was increasing over time, and my guess was that the blog was getting on more and more spam lists as the spam comments were visible for a while until I got round to deleting them, and therefore appeared in some Greatest Hits in a database somewhere. My hope is that, now the blog has been silent for a few months, whoever does these things will have assumed the blog is no more and will have moved onto more fertile soil.
So, WV is OFF for the time being. Comment all you like, magnifying glasses not necessary. If the spam returns, I will have another think. It has been suggested that I allow comments from registered users only, which would solve the problem, but might bring others in its wake. We shall see.
If anyone has any bright ideas, let me know - in the comments :)
Here's a poster to make you laugh.
Monday, 28 October 2013
Fleet update
For those who are interested ...
I had to move everything about yesterday to clear leaves and stuff from my usual storage locations, and I ended up with all three bikes on the driveway, and I thought it would be an ideal photo opportunity. There's one new addition to the fleet since the last bike-related post here.
Here's the chorus line:
From left to right:
Yamaha XT660R, 2006, fully functional, road legal, the commuter and everyday reliable workhorse. Previous owner rode it to Romania and back (from his name on the V5, I think he was visiting relatives) and I intend to give it a similar workout before too long. Not to Romania, but further than the Severn Bridge, for sure.
Triumph Trident 750, 1994 (but an early VIN, probably made in 1992), one of the early Hinckley revival Triumphs. Bought because I could no longer credibly be the Chairman of my branch of the Owners' Club without owning a Triumph, and this was a very cheap eBay purchase in May. Bought (more or less) to say I had one in the shed, and perhaps to keep with a view to long-term restoration. In fact, it is a superb bit of kit, and I am hooked. It had 52k on the clock when I got it (53k now) and it is not without its faults, but it is rideable and goes pretty well for an old girl. I'm now focusing on a gradual improvement schedule. The immediate stuff has all been done, and I am now onto the refinements (hollow laugh).
Yamaha XT600E, 1995 (but made in 1994), SORNed, no tax, no insurance, no battery as of yesterday. A triumph (heh) of mid-90s tasteless colour vandalism - pale green, lilac and white. The puppy I cannot abandon. Long-term, it's going to get money spent on it and made fantastic, but short-term it's under a cover behind the shed. I found an interesting nest of spiders in the air intake yesterday. Not at the top of my priority list, but when time and funds allow, it's getting the treatment. I have a lot of lurve for this bike.
Ah, choices.
I had to move everything about yesterday to clear leaves and stuff from my usual storage locations, and I ended up with all three bikes on the driveway, and I thought it would be an ideal photo opportunity. There's one new addition to the fleet since the last bike-related post here.
Here's the chorus line:
From left to right:
Yamaha XT660R, 2006, fully functional, road legal, the commuter and everyday reliable workhorse. Previous owner rode it to Romania and back (from his name on the V5, I think he was visiting relatives) and I intend to give it a similar workout before too long. Not to Romania, but further than the Severn Bridge, for sure.
Triumph Trident 750, 1994 (but an early VIN, probably made in 1992), one of the early Hinckley revival Triumphs. Bought because I could no longer credibly be the Chairman of my branch of the Owners' Club without owning a Triumph, and this was a very cheap eBay purchase in May. Bought (more or less) to say I had one in the shed, and perhaps to keep with a view to long-term restoration. In fact, it is a superb bit of kit, and I am hooked. It had 52k on the clock when I got it (53k now) and it is not without its faults, but it is rideable and goes pretty well for an old girl. I'm now focusing on a gradual improvement schedule. The immediate stuff has all been done, and I am now onto the refinements (hollow laugh).
Yamaha XT600E, 1995 (but made in 1994), SORNed, no tax, no insurance, no battery as of yesterday. A triumph (heh) of mid-90s tasteless colour vandalism - pale green, lilac and white. The puppy I cannot abandon. Long-term, it's going to get money spent on it and made fantastic, but short-term it's under a cover behind the shed. I found an interesting nest of spiders in the air intake yesterday. Not at the top of my priority list, but when time and funds allow, it's getting the treatment. I have a lot of lurve for this bike.
Ah, choices.
Night visitors
A little while ago, I gave in to a long-held wish and bought myself a trail camera. If you haven't seen one of these, it's a camera which straps to a tree or mounts on a post, and works off a PIR sensor, with IR illumination so it can take shots in the dark. It can take either stills or video, or a combination of the two, and is fully weatherproof. It's made in woodland camouflage colours and runs off AA batteries. With an extra battery pack, it can be left for up to six months and will capture any object that is warmer than the background. This is the one I got - an American LTL Acorn Scouting Camera Ltl-5210A:
So far, I have had some mildly interesting results, although I have to say that the camera's performance is slightly disappointing. Picture quality is modest (about as good as a cheap smartphone) and the range at night is only about 5m - that is, an object needs to be within 5m to trigger the camera, although it will capture an image up to about 15m, with the outer limits quite faint.
I have set it up at various places round the garden over several nights, and results have been getting better, so I imagine that with practice I can get some interesting images. So far, I have discovered that Rescue Cat is an early bird as well as a midnight rambler:
and that the cat that the people in the cottage next door swear they know nothing about is a regular visitor:
But the best of all is an answer to the question: Who has been leaving the small black turds in the middle of the lawn? When Bonkers Dog was alive, he would regularly come home with lovely doggy aftershave in the form of stinking black streaks on his neck. Now we know why:
I know of several places where badgers run, and the next step (after satisfying the fox curiosity) will be to put the camera deep in the woods for a few nights and see what transpires.
| Padlock? It would prevent theft of the SD card, but not the camera, which is held by a nylon strap |
So far, I have had some mildly interesting results, although I have to say that the camera's performance is slightly disappointing. Picture quality is modest (about as good as a cheap smartphone) and the range at night is only about 5m - that is, an object needs to be within 5m to trigger the camera, although it will capture an image up to about 15m, with the outer limits quite faint.
I have set it up at various places round the garden over several nights, and results have been getting better, so I imagine that with practice I can get some interesting images. So far, I have discovered that Rescue Cat is an early bird as well as a midnight rambler:
| Monarch of all she surveys |
| We call him 'Pink Cat' and he really is pink, well, pinky-beige. Not in this photo, though |
| Don't mind me, I'm just off for a quick dump |
| Need to find the exact spot for maximum impact |
| Got it. Exactly on a line between kitchen door and compost bin, hur hur |
The 'Storm' that wasn't
Here's a thought.
There were dire predictions over the past few days of a Great Storm coming to the South of the UK, a great storm to rival the humdinger we had in 1987. Ground already soaked, trees still almost in full leaf, therefore massive flooding and trees torn up and flung about like matchsticks. Or something. Over the days, the predictions of the route the low would take started with Pembrokeshire and Cornwall taking the brunt of the storm when it made landfall, but the predicted route was later thought to be a little further South. Nevertheless, winds of 95 mph were predicted, damage to trees and property, flooding and mayhem.
I'm not one to over-react to scare stories, having over my life found most of them to be unfounded. But yesterday I got the bikes under cover, the garden furniture in the shed, the bins indoors and everything moveable lashed down. The forecasts were serious enough to overcome my basic laziness and Pollyanna optimism.
There was some rain in the night, and it was a bit windy. I haven't read around the news sites yet, and I imagine some places had it much worse, but for Pembrokeshire it was all a bit of a let-down.
This isn't a Daily Mail-type "why can't these fools get it right?" rant. I accept that most people act in good faith and sometimes people get it wrong. I don't blame Michael Fish for the hurricane, and I don't blame the surgeon who missed seeing my Father's cancer at a stage where it might have been treatable. I don't blame the forecasters who predicted murder and mayhem for my neck of the woods last night, either. They simply got it wrong. I kept an eye on things with the BBC weather service, the Met Office and a couple of weather apps on the phone, plus a Facebook feed from someone called Winter Weather 2013-14, and they all told the same story. As the people concerned are experienced meteorologists, and the computers are presumable the best you can buy, this leads me to believe that the models are faulty - or at least much less accurate than the meteorologists think they are.
And that's the point. I'm told on Sunday afternoon that it's Armageddon by Sunday night, and it isn't. How can I believe that these same people and models can predict what the weather is going to be like in 2050?
(And yes, I am not an infant and I know that weather is not the same as climate. But weather is how climate manifests itself in the same way that woodland manifests itself in individual trees. If you are predicting climate, you are also predicting the specific weather conditions associated with that climate.)
There were dire predictions over the past few days of a Great Storm coming to the South of the UK, a great storm to rival the humdinger we had in 1987. Ground already soaked, trees still almost in full leaf, therefore massive flooding and trees torn up and flung about like matchsticks. Or something. Over the days, the predictions of the route the low would take started with Pembrokeshire and Cornwall taking the brunt of the storm when it made landfall, but the predicted route was later thought to be a little further South. Nevertheless, winds of 95 mph were predicted, damage to trees and property, flooding and mayhem.
I'm not one to over-react to scare stories, having over my life found most of them to be unfounded. But yesterday I got the bikes under cover, the garden furniture in the shed, the bins indoors and everything moveable lashed down. The forecasts were serious enough to overcome my basic laziness and Pollyanna optimism.
There was some rain in the night, and it was a bit windy. I haven't read around the news sites yet, and I imagine some places had it much worse, but for Pembrokeshire it was all a bit of a let-down.
This isn't a Daily Mail-type "why can't these fools get it right?" rant. I accept that most people act in good faith and sometimes people get it wrong. I don't blame Michael Fish for the hurricane, and I don't blame the surgeon who missed seeing my Father's cancer at a stage where it might have been treatable. I don't blame the forecasters who predicted murder and mayhem for my neck of the woods last night, either. They simply got it wrong. I kept an eye on things with the BBC weather service, the Met Office and a couple of weather apps on the phone, plus a Facebook feed from someone called Winter Weather 2013-14, and they all told the same story. As the people concerned are experienced meteorologists, and the computers are presumable the best you can buy, this leads me to believe that the models are faulty - or at least much less accurate than the meteorologists think they are.
And that's the point. I'm told on Sunday afternoon that it's Armageddon by Sunday night, and it isn't. How can I believe that these same people and models can predict what the weather is going to be like in 2050?
(And yes, I am not an infant and I know that weather is not the same as climate. But weather is how climate manifests itself in the same way that woodland manifests itself in individual trees. If you are predicting climate, you are also predicting the specific weather conditions associated with that climate.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
